Head to head
Atlanta, GA vs Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $258/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $6,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
It flips for a family. For two adults with a pre-schooler and a school-age child, Atlanta is the cheaper of the two — rent scales to household size using each city's own bedroom spread, and childcare varies even more sharply between cities than rent does.
| Metric | Atlanta66 | Bakersfield63 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,387 | $4,129 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $9,218 | $10,022 |
| Salary for comfort | $83,000/yr | $77,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,820 | $1,483 |
| Median home value | $420,600 | $347,300 |
| Median household income | $81,938 | $77,397 |
| Unemployment | 3.7% | 6.2% |
| Housing score | 47 | 65 |
| Jobs score | 86 | 33 |
| Safety score | 26 | 54 |
| Climate score | 100 | 90 |
| Amenities score | 68 | 47 |
| Population | 499.3K | 408.4K |
| Summer high / winter low | 90° / 33° | 97° / 39° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Atlanta, GA
Bakersfield, CA