Head to head
Aurora, CO vs Oakland, CA
Aurora is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $784/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $16,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Aurora59 | Oakland41 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,214 | $4,998 |
| Salary for comfort | $79,500/yr | $96,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,830 | $2,450 |
| Median home value | $444,500 | $924,700 |
| Median household income | $84,320 | $97,369 |
| Unemployment | 4.2% | 5.2% |
| Housing score | 34 | 7 |
| Jobs score | 53 | 32 |
| Safety score | 62 | 9 |
| Climate score | 76 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 28 | 57 |
| Population | 390.2K | 438.1K |
| Summer high / winter low | 89° / 18° | 73° / 45° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Aurora, CO
Oakland, CA