Head to head
Aurora, CO vs Worcester, MA
Worcester is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $29/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $1,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
It flips for a family. For two adults with a pre-schooler and a school-age child, Aurora is the cheaper of the two — rent scales to household size using each city's own bedroom spread, and childcare varies even more sharply between cities than rent does.
| Metric | Aurora51 | Worcester52 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,507 | $4,478 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $11,530 | $11,611 |
| Salary for comfort | $84,500/yr | $85,500/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,089 | $2,166 |
| Median home value | $444,500 | $339,500 |
| Median household income | $84,320 | $67,544 |
| Unemployment | 4.2% | 4.4% |
| Housing score | 35 | 30 |
| Jobs score | 40 | 46 |
| Safety score | 30 | 42 |
| Climate score | 74 | 67 |
| Amenities score | 47 | 47 |
| Population | 390.2K | 205.5K |
| Summer high / winter low | 88° / 17° | 79° / 17° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Aurora, CO
Worcester, MA