Head to head
Bakersfield, CA vs Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $848/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $24,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Bakersfield57 | Las Vegas57 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,920 | $4,072 |
| Est. monthly cost (household of 4) | $9,823 | $7,703 |
| Salary for comfort | $96,000/yr | $71,500/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,483 | $1,735 |
| Median home value | $347,300 | $395,300 |
| Median household income | $77,397 | $70,723 |
| Unemployment | 5.4% | 5.3% |
| Housing score | 67 | 35 |
| Jobs score | 32 | 43 |
| Safety score | 54 | 17 |
| Climate score | 90 | 76 |
| Amenities score | 47 | 92 |
| Population | 408.4K | 650.9K |
| Summer high / winter low | 97° / 37° | 104° / 38° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Bakersfield, CA
Las Vegas, NV