Where Do I Move?

Head to head

Bakersfield, CA vs Saint Paul, MN

Saint Paul is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $295/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $6,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).

It flips for a family. For two adults with a pre-schooler and a school-age child, Bakersfield is the cheaper of the two — rent scales to household size using each city's own bedroom spread, and childcare varies even more sharply between cities than rent does.

MetricBakersfield63Saint Paul61
Est. monthly cost (single)$4,129$3,834
Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare)$10,022$10,204
Salary for comfort$77,000/yr$71,000/yr
Typical rent$1,483$1,248
Median home value$347,300$280,300
Median household income$77,397$73,055
Unemployment6.2%4.4%
Housing score6577
Jobs score3337
Safety score5448
Climate score9061
Amenities score4747
Population408.4K307.8K
Summer high / winter low97° / 39°83° / 9°

Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.

Compare with your own income & weights
Bakersfield, CA vs Saint Paul, MN: cost of living & salary comparison · WhereDoIMove