Head to head
Chicago, IL vs Fort Worth, TX
Fort Worth is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $13/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $5,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
It flips for a family. For two adults with a pre-schooler and a school-age child, Chicago is the cheaper of the two — rent scales to household size using each city's own bedroom spread, and childcare varies even more sharply between cities than rent does.
| Metric | Chicago61 | Fort Worth75 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,293 | $4,280 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $9,545 | $10,058 |
| Salary for comfort | $81,000/yr | $75,500/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,781 | $1,723 |
| Median home value | $315,200 | $277,300 |
| Median household income | $75,134 | $76,602 |
| Unemployment | 5.9% | 4.8% |
| Housing score | 52 | 66 |
| Jobs score | 7 | 47 |
| Safety score | 66 | 79 |
| Climate score | 89 | 94 |
| Amenities score | 73 | 77 |
| Population | 2.7M | 941.3K |
| Summer high / winter low | 85° / 21° | 95° / 35° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Chicago, IL
Fort Worth, TX