Head to head
Corona, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Corona is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $192/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $4,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
It flips for a family. For two adults with a pre-schooler and a school-age child, Rancho Cucamonga is the cheaper of the two — rent scales to household size using each city's own bedroom spread, and childcare varies even more sharply between cities than rent does.
| Metric | Corona63 | Rancho Cucamonga62 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,694 | $4,886 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $11,126 | $10,593 |
| Salary for comfort | $90,000/yr | $94,500/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,136 | $2,286 |
| Median home value | $656,500 | $694,400 |
| Median household income | $106,438 | $109,511 |
| Unemployment | 4.6% | 4.3% |
| Housing score | 44 | 38 |
| Jobs score | 40 | 47 |
| Safety score | 74 | 77 |
| Climate score | 100 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 52 | 50 |
| Population | 158.8K | 174.7K |
| Summer high / winter low | 92° / 39° | 92° / 44° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Corona, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA