Head to head
Fort Collins, CO vs Lancaster, CA
Fort Collins is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $662/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $16,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Fort Collins53 | Lancaster53 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,399 | $5,061 |
| Salary for comfort | $82,500/yr | $99,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,938 | $2,403 |
| Median home value | $548,400 | $409,100 |
| Median household income | $83,598 | $76,083 |
| Unemployment | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Housing score | 33 | 26 |
| Jobs score | 56 | 56 |
| Safety score | 60 | 60 |
| Climate score | 42 | 57 |
| Amenities score | 29 | 64 |
| Population | 169.7K | 170K |
| Summer high / winter low | 87° / 18° | 98° / 31° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Fort Collins, CO
Lancaster, CA