Head to head
Fremont, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Rancho Cucamonga is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $537/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $13,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Fremont62 | Rancho Cucamonga62 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $5,423 | $4,886 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $14,796 | $10,593 |
| Salary for comfort | $107,500/yr | $94,500/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,912 | $2,286 |
| Median home value | $1,289,400 | $694,400 |
| Median household income | $176,350 | $109,511 |
| Unemployment | 4.2% | 4.3% |
| Housing score | 44 | 38 |
| Jobs score | 46 | 47 |
| Safety score | 84 | 77 |
| Climate score | 100 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 59 | 50 |
| Population | 228.5K | 174.7K |
| Summer high / winter low | 77° / 43° | 92° / 44° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Fremont, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA