Head to head
Las Vegas, NV vs Oakland, CA
Las Vegas is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $1,046/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $29,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Las Vegas56 | Oakland40 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,278 | $5,324 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $10,530 | $14,608 |
| Salary for comfort | $75,500/yr | $105,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,735 | $2,912 |
| Median home value | $395,300 | $924,700 |
| Median household income | $70,723 | $97,369 |
| Unemployment | 5.2% | 4.6% |
| Housing score | 32 | 6 |
| Jobs score | 46 | 36 |
| Safety score | 17 | 0 |
| Climate score | 76 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 92 | 71 |
| Population | 650.9K | 438.1K |
| Summer high / winter low | 104° / 38° | 72° / 46° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Las Vegas, NV
Oakland, CA