Head to head
Las Vegas, NV vs San Francisco, CA
Las Vegas is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $2,807/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $71,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Las Vegas57 | San Francisco54 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $4,072 | $6,879 |
| Est. monthly cost (household of 4) | $7,703 | $12,433 |
| Salary for comfort | $71,500/yr | $143,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,735 | $3,604 |
| Median home value | $395,300 | $1,380,500 |
| Median household income | $70,723 | $141,446 |
| Unemployment | 5.3% | 3.3% |
| Housing score | 35 | 15 |
| Jobs score | 43 | 65 |
| Safety score | 17 | 62 |
| Climate score | 76 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 92 | 85 |
| Population | 650.9K | 836.3K |
| Summer high / winter low | 104° / 38° | 67° / 46° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Las Vegas, NV
San Francisco, CA