Head to head
Lincoln, NE vs St. Louis, MO
Lincoln is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $23/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
It flips for a family. For two adults with a pre-schooler and a school-age child, St. Louis is the cheaper of the two — rent scales to household size using each city's own bedroom spread, and childcare varies even more sharply between cities than rent does.
| Metric | Lincoln77 | St. Louis63 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $3,462 | $3,485 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $8,729 | $8,482 |
| Salary for comfort | $62,500/yr | $63,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,141 | $1,218 |
| Median home value | $248,200 | $185,100 |
| Median household income | $69,991 | $55,279 |
| Unemployment | 2.9% | 4.1% |
| Housing score | 85 | 71 |
| Jobs score | 90 | 72 |
| Safety score | 64 | 6 |
| Climate score | 84 | 97 |
| Amenities score | 27 | 40 |
| Population | 291.9K | 293.1K |
| Summer high / winter low | 89° / 14° | 88° / 23° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Lincoln, NE
St. Louis, MO