Head to head
Lincoln, NE vs St. Louis, MO
Lincoln is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $31/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $0 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Lincoln76 | St. Louis59 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $3,322 | $3,353 |
| Salary for comfort | $60,500/yr | $60,500/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,180 | $1,120 |
| Median home value | $248,200 | $185,100 |
| Median household income | $69,991 | $55,279 |
| Unemployment | 2.8% | 3.8% |
| Housing score | 84 | 71 |
| Jobs score | 67 | 30 |
| Safety score | 80 | 3 |
| Climate score | 82 | 97 |
| Amenities score | 27 | 62 |
| Population | 291.9K | 293.1K |
| Summer high / winter low | 89° / 13° | 90° / 24° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Lincoln, NE
St. Louis, MO