Head to head
Los Angeles, CA vs Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $2,430/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $57,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Los Angeles47 | Milwaukee65 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $6,022 | $3,592 |
| Est. monthly cost (household of 4) | $11,266 | $6,625 |
| Salary for comfort | $122,000/yr | $65,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,903 | $1,338 |
| Median home value | $879,500 | $172,000 |
| Median household income | $80,366 | $51,888 |
| Unemployment | 5.3% | 4.1% |
| Housing score | 2 | 62 |
| Jobs score | 25 | 55 |
| Safety score | 47 | 41 |
| Climate score | 100 | 70 |
| Amenities score | 100 | 65 |
| Population | 3.9M | 569.8K |
| Summer high / winter low | 89° / 47° | 80° / 16° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Los Angeles, CA
Milwaukee, WI