Head to head
Los Angeles, CA vs Oakland, CA
Los Angeles is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $330/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $8,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Los Angeles47 | Oakland36 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $6,022 | $6,352 |
| Est. monthly cost (household of 4) | $11,266 | $12,207 |
| Salary for comfort | $122,000/yr | $130,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,903 | $2,912 |
| Median home value | $879,500 | $924,700 |
| Median household income | $80,366 | $97,369 |
| Unemployment | 5.3% | 4.1% |
| Housing score | 2 | 8 |
| Jobs score | 25 | 39 |
| Safety score | 47 | 0 |
| Climate score | 100 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 100 | 71 |
| Population | 3.9M | 438.1K |
| Summer high / winter low | 89° / 47° | 72° / 44° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Los Angeles, CA
Oakland, CA