Head to head
Los Angeles, CA vs Omaha, NE
Omaha is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $2,402/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $56,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Los Angeles47 | Omaha78 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $6,022 | $3,620 |
| Est. monthly cost (household of 4) | $11,266 | $6,848 |
| Salary for comfort | $122,000/yr | $65,500/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,903 | $1,368 |
| Median home value | $879,500 | $230,100 |
| Median household income | $80,366 | $72,708 |
| Unemployment | 5.3% | 2.9% |
| Housing score | 2 | 88 |
| Jobs score | 25 | 89 |
| Safety score | 47 | 61 |
| Climate score | 100 | 84 |
| Amenities score | 100 | 44 |
| Population | 3.9M | 488.2K |
| Summer high / winter low | 89° / 47° | 87° / 14° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Los Angeles, CA
Omaha, NE