Head to head
Los Angeles, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Los Angeles is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $536/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $13,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Los Angeles49 | San Francisco58 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $5,329 | $5,865 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $12,135 | $15,429 |
| Salary for comfort | $105,000/yr | $118,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,903 | $3,604 |
| Median home value | $879,500 | $1,380,500 |
| Median household income | $80,366 | $141,446 |
| Unemployment | 5.3% | 3.7% |
| Housing score | 1 | 12 |
| Jobs score | 20 | 69 |
| Safety score | 47 | 62 |
| Climate score | 100 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 100 | 85 |
| Population | 3.9M | 836.3K |
| Summer high / winter low | 83° / 48° | 67° / 46° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Los Angeles, CA
San Francisco, CA