Head to head
Los Angeles, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Tulsa is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $2,580/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $60,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Los Angeles47 | Tulsa60 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $6,022 | $3,442 |
| Est. monthly cost (household of 4) | $11,266 | $6,571 |
| Salary for comfort | $122,000/yr | $62,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,903 | $1,217 |
| Median home value | $879,500 | $189,600 |
| Median household income | $80,366 | $58,407 |
| Unemployment | 5.3% | 4.7% |
| Housing score | 2 | 80 |
| Jobs score | 25 | 18 |
| Safety score | 47 | 20 |
| Climate score | 100 | 98 |
| Amenities score | 100 | 53 |
| Population | 3.9M | 412.3K |
| Summer high / winter low | 89° / 47° | 93° / 28° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Los Angeles, CA
Tulsa, OK