Head to head
Omaha, NE vs San Diego, CA
Omaha is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $2,737/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $64,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Omaha78 | San Diego63 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $3,620 | $6,357 |
| Est. monthly cost (household of 4) | $6,848 | $12,498 |
| Salary for comfort | $65,500/yr | $130,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,368 | $3,001 |
| Median home value | $230,100 | $848,500 |
| Median household income | $72,708 | $104,321 |
| Unemployment | 2.9% | 3.8% |
| Housing score | 88 | 12 |
| Jobs score | 89 | 56 |
| Safety score | 61 | 100 |
| Climate score | 84 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 44 | 95 |
| Population | 488.2K | 1.4M |
| Summer high / winter low | 87° / 14° | 75° / 49° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Omaha, NE
San Diego, CA