Head to head
Sacramento, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Sacramento is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $1,361/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $33,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Sacramento56 | San Francisco54 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $5,518 | $6,879 |
| Est. monthly cost (household of 4) | $10,619 | $12,433 |
| Salary for comfort | $110,000/yr | $143,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $2,255 | $3,604 |
| Median home value | $484,600 | $1,380,500 |
| Median household income | $83,753 | $141,446 |
| Unemployment | 4.3% | 3.3% |
| Housing score | 26 | 15 |
| Jobs score | 34 | 65 |
| Safety score | 67 | 62 |
| Climate score | 98 | 100 |
| Amenities score | 83 | 85 |
| Population | 524.8K | 836.3K |
| Summer high / winter low | 93° / 41° | 67° / 46° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Sacramento, CA
San Francisco, CA