Head to head
St. Louis, MO vs Wichita, KS
Wichita is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $91/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $1,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | St. Louis61 | Wichita66 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $3,272 | $3,181 |
| Salary for comfort | $59,000/yr | $58,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,120 | $1,010 |
| Median home value | $180,000 | $175,000 |
| Median household income | $52,000 | $58,000 |
| Unemployment | 3.8% | 3.6% |
| Housing score | 75 | 96 |
| Jobs score | 36 | 44 |
| Safety score | 3 | 18 |
| Climate score | 97 | 97 |
| Amenities score | 61 | 39 |
| Population | 286K | 396K |
| Summer high / winter low | 90° / 24° | 93° / 24° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
St. Louis, MO
Wichita, KS