Head to head
Omaha, NE vs San Antonio, TX
Omaha is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $145/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $1,000 less in annual salary (taxes included).
It flips for a family. For two adults with a pre-schooler and a school-age child, San Antonio is the cheaper of the two — rent scales to household size using each city's own bedroom spread, and childcare varies even more sharply between cities than rent does.
| Metric | Omaha78 | San Antonio65 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $3,683 | $3,828 |
| Est. monthly cost (family of 4, incl. childcare) | $9,062 | $8,835 |
| Salary for comfort | $67,000/yr | $66,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,368 | $1,426 |
| Median home value | $230,100 | $219,700 |
| Median household income | $72,708 | $62,917 |
| Unemployment | 3.3% | 4.7% |
| Housing score | 86 | 67 |
| Jobs score | 90 | 43 |
| Safety score | 61 | 35 |
| Climate score | 84 | 94 |
| Amenities score | 44 | 54 |
| Population | 488.2K | 1.5M |
| Summer high / winter low | 87° / 14° | 95° / 41° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Omaha, NE
San Antonio, TX